Secondly, we should approach political calls to cut petrol, diesel and fuel prices with caution. Such easing should not be applied randomly, but (if at all) for a limited period and in a targeted way to cushion the social consequences. Because by distorting prices in favour of fossil energy sources, reductions jeopardise the transition to sustainable energy. What’s more, they prolong a reliance on fossil fuels that would persist even if Russian gas were replaced by gas from Qatar.
Thirdly, Switzerland must be more far-sighted in promoting and supporting the conversion of the infrastructure. The cantons of Glarus and Zurich have set a good example, and since they banned oil and gas heating systems (Zurich from 2040), homeowners are increasingly switching to heat pumps. Yet those looking to purchase a pump must wait up to six months
7
, a direct consequence of the failure of politicians to give timely encouragement to develop this sector.
Soaring oil and gas prices won’t miraculously bring about the end of the fossil fuel era – but by addressing energy dependencies, politicians can help set the course for a CO
2
-neutral Switzerland. In energy research, we speak of a “trilemma” between affordability, sustainability and security. Renewables are now affordable, and they’re key to a sustainable energy supply. Lately, their benefits from a neutrality and security policy angle have become apparent too. So maybe the trilemma can be solved in the end.