What will you do with the findings from the symposium?
We’ve prepared a paper on the further development of the doctorate which incorporates the findings from the symposium. We’re currently in the process of evaluating the feedback from the consultation. The goal is then to amend the doctoral regulations as soon as possible and close up some of the gaps in the current regulations.
Which gaps are those?
To give one example, we need to strengthen the research plan as a tool. The plan isn’t just a formality; it is in fact a brilliant way to clarify common goals, crucial steps and the responsibilities of each individual. That’s why I would say we need to make research plans more binding. We suggest, for instance, that students defend their research plans at a colloquium after one year – and that the definitive admissions decision only comes afterwards.
How does the dual supervision of doctoral students work?
That’s also an extremely important point. We’ve already implemented this in part, but the specific goal is that all doctoral students at ETH should work with two supervisors. This kind of dual supervision system will do more than simply reduce dependency: it will also encourage interaction and increase diversity.
Could changing the doctoral regulation cause the doctorate to become “overregulated”?
I completely understand why that might be a concern, but I can guarantee that that won’t be the case. Ultimately, the proposed changes are sensible adjustments to the existing doctoral regulation, or perhaps supplements if necessary. That’s also why we’re working so closely with the departments: we want to know what their needs are, and we also want to show them how everyone can benefit when individual aspects are clarified and institutionalised.
What would your ideal doctorate of the future look like?
Carefully selected and highly motivated doctoral students exchanging ideas as part of small, well-integrated research groups. The students have intensive contact with their supervisors, as well as with researchers from other disciplines and universities. They’re satisfied, but also independent and critical, meaning there are lots of doors open to them in terms of how they can shape their future careers, be it in the private sector or the world of academia. Sounds good, doesn’t it?
